Compatibility of Computer-Based Learning with Differentiated Learning Styles of Chemical Engineering Students as Evidenced by the Outcomes

Evelyn A. Cardoso

Abstract


The incorporation of more computer-based courses and teaching-learning strategies in the Chemical Engineering (CHE) curriculum prompted educators to use information technology more effectively and efficiently. Thus, this research investigated the compatibility of Computer-Based Learning (CBL) with the learning styles of the CHE students through their learning outcomes. With a quasi-experimental research design, the researcher employed a CBL instrument structured in four steps (see-try-do-explain) and assessed the learning style preferences using the Felder-Solomon Index of learning style. The respondents included all fourth-year students enrolled in the Computer Applications in Chemical Engineering. The study revealed that CHE students are mostly sensing and visual; they found it hardest to transition from step ‘see’ to step ‘try’. Verbal and global learners will most likely survive in the four-step CBL while active learners will lag. However, the research failed to show that CBL was significantly compatible with the differentiated learning styles of the CHE students.

Keywords


Competency-based learning; Four-step e-learning; Teaching strategy; Transition mortality/survival rate

Full Text:

JEHRD007

References


Abech, M., da Costa, C., Barbosa, J., Rigo, S., & da Rosa Righi, R. (2016). A model for learning objects adaptation in light of mobile and context-aware computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20(2),167–184.

Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A study of student’s perceptions in a blended Learning Environment Based on Different. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183-193.

Alharbi, A., Paul, D., Henskens, F., & Hannaford, M. (2011). An investigation into the learning styles and self-regulated learning strategies for computer science students. Australia: The University of Newcastle.

Bayraktar, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2),173-188.

Cabellon, E. T., & Brown, P. G. (2017). Remixing leadership practices with emerging technologies. New Directions forStudentLeadership,153,9-20.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago:Ravenio Books.

Cook, D. A. (2012). Revisiting cognitive and learning styles in computer-assisted instruction. Academic Medicine, 87(6), 778-784.

Cook, D. A., Thompson, W. G., Thomas, K. G., & Thomas, M. R. (2009). Lack of interaction between sensing–intuitive learning styles and problem-first versus information-first instruction: Arandomized crossover trial. Advances in Health SciencesEducation,14(1),79-90.

Faessler, L., Hinterberger, H., Dahinden, M., & Wyss, M. (2006). Evaluating student motivation in constructivistic, problem-based introductory computer science courses. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita(Eds.),ProceedingsofE-Learn 2006–World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare,

and Higher Education (pp. 1178-1185). Honolulu,Hawaii,USA:Associationforthe Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

F¨ assler,L.,Sichau,D.,&Dahinden,M.(2017). E.Tutorials. Retrieved from E.Tutorials Individualized Online Instruction For Basic Computer Science Lessons. Retrieved fromhttps://www.et.ethz.ch/.

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988, January). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-81.

Felder, R. M., & Solomon, B. A. (n.d.). Index of learning style questionnaire. Retrieved from NC State University: https://www.webtools.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/

Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability, and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.

Finlayson, B. A. (2012). Introduction to chemical engineering computing (2nd ed.). Hoboken,NewJersey: JohnWiley& Sons,Inc.

Franzoni, A. L., Assar, S., Defude, B., & Rojas, J. (2008). Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. A paper presented at the 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Cantabria,Spain.

Graf, S., Kinshuk, & Liu, T.C. (2009). Supporting teachers in identifying students’ learning styles in learning management systems: an automatic student modelling approach. Educational Technology&Society,12(4),3-14.

Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students’ self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist,45(4),245-257.

Handley, M. A., Lyles, C. R., McCulloch, C., & Cattamanchi, A. (2018). Selecting and improving quasi-experimental designs in effectiveness and implementation research. Annual Review of Public Health, 39,5-25.

Hanzelka, L. A. (2013). Learning styles: A viable approach to instruction? University of Northern Iowa. University Honors Program. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/33

Hinterberger, H. (2007). E-Learning: make it as simple as possible, but not simpler. African Technology Development Forum Journal,4(2),11-18.

Hosford, C. C., & Siders, W. A. (2010, January). Felder-Soloman’s index of learning styles: internal consistency, temporal stability, and factor structure. TeachingandLearninginMedicine,22(4), 298-303.

Hsieh, S.W., Jang, Y.R., Hwang, G.J., & Chen, N.S. (2011). Effects of teaching and learning styles on students’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers &Education,57(1),1194–1201.

Hwang,G.J.,Sung,H.Y.,Hung,C.M.,Huang, I., & Tsai, C.C. (2012). Development of a personalized educational computer game based on students’ learning styles. Educational Technology Research and Development,60(4),623–638.

Jingyun Wang, T. M. (2015). The reliability and validity of Felder-Silverman index

of learning styles in mandarin version. Information Engineering Express, 1(3), 1-8.

Kim, J., & Kwon, Y. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers and Education, 57(2),1512-1520.

Klasnja-Milicevic, A., Vesin, B., Ivanovic, M., & Budimac, Z. (2011). E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & Education,56(3),885-899.

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersy:Pearson EducationLimited.

Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2008). Learning styles of science and engineering students in problem and project based education. Retrieved from http://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/learningstyles-of-science-and-engineering-student s-in-problem-and-project-based-education (db3daec0-8e55-11dd-93c5-000ea68e967 b).html

Kulik, C.L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (2014). Effectiveness of computer-based education in colleges. AEDS Journal, 19(2-3),81-108.

Learning Styles. (2010). ISLN and Research. Retrieved from ILSA International Learning Styles Australia: http://www.ilsa-learni ng-styles.com/Learning+Styles/The+Dunn +and+Dunn+Learning+ Styles+Model.html

Lowe, J. (2014). Computer-based education, is it a panacea? Journal of Research on TechnologyinEducation,34(2),163-171.

McLeod, S. (2013). Kolb - learning styles. Retrieved from www.simply psychology.org/learning-kolb.html Minitab Inc. (n.d.). Are the results of my chi-square test invalid? Retrieved from http://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/1 7/topic-library/basic-statistics-and-graphs/ tables/chi-square/are-the-results-of-my-chi -square-test-invalid/

Neira, E. A., Iba˜ nez, J. M., & Crosetti, B. D. (2018). Model of incorporation of emerging technologies in the classroom (MIETC). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET),13(6),124-148.

Pashler,H.,McDaniel,M.,Rohrer,D.,&Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the publicinterest,9(3),105-119.

Pitts, S., Prost, J. H., & Winters, J. J. (2008). Quasi-experimental designs in developmental research: design and analysis considerations. In D. M. Teti (Ed.). Handbook of research methods in developmental science. Oxford, U.K:John Wiley&Sons.

Psomos, P., & Kordaki, M. (2012). Pedagogical guidelines for the development of educational digital storytelling environments based on a pedagogical evaluation star. Retrieved from https://www.ceid.upatras.gr/webpages/fac ulty/kordaki/conf-eng/C57.pdf

Romanelli, F. B. (2009). Learning styles: A review of theory, application, and best practices. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,73(1),9.

Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2009). Emerging web technologies in higher education: A case of incorporating blogs,

podcasts and social bookmarks in a web programming course based on students’ learning styles and technology preferences. Educational Technology & Society,12(4),98–109.

Tulsi, P., Poonia, M., & Anupriya. (2016). Learning styles and achievement of engineering students. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference. Abu Dhabi,United Arab Emirates.

Valencia-Molina, T., Serna-Collazos, A., Ochoa-Angrino, S., Montes-Gonz´ alez, J., & Ch´avez-Vescance, J. (2016). ICT standards and competencies from the pedagogical dimension: a perspective from levels of ICT adoption in teachers’ education practice. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MUL TIMEDIA/FIELD/Santiago/pdf/ICT-Standar ds-and-competencies.pdf

Wilcox, W. R. (2012). Engineering spreadsheets using Excel 2010, II. Retrieved from Tutorials on Engineering Computations using Microsoft Excel: http://www.clarkson.edu/wwilcox/ES100/xl -tut2.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.